Topic summary
79% 29 analyzed articles/videos 31,331 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Conspiracy Theories results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 22,610 hits . Analysis detected 182,110 faulty-reasoning hits from 186,548 analyzed words across 29 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 31% (15,932 of 22,835 topics). This Conspiracy Theories is better (less manipulative) than 69.80% of the peer group. Conspiracy Theories
Topic details
Total words: 186,548
Article count: 29
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.2% percentile 1.8% BS Score29 analyzed articles186.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.9% 9.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 12.1% 12.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.0% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst