27.1K articles rankedframing effect79.7% higher vs 2.6% lower

Signal gap atlas

Distance shows how strongly the high and low ends of the ranking separate.

High and low ranking signal comparisonHorizontal connected dots compare higher-score, lower-score, and overall rates for each reasoning signal.0%25%50%75%100%framing effect3%80%appeal to authoritynegativity biasin-group biasappeal to emotionhalo effectfundamental attribution errorout-group homogeneity biashasty generalizationblind-spot biasrecency biasambiguity (equivocation)
Higher-score averageLower-score averageOverall average

Rank terrain

Position connects percentile, BS score, and the amount of supporting analysis.

BS score by ranking percentileDots show ranking examples. Horizontal position is percentile, vertical position is BS score, and dot size reflects supporting analyzed items.0255075100th0%50%100%Ranking percentileBS scoreDid you just get the 'Gen Z stare' at work? This is why.
Higher-score cohort

Did you just get the 'Gen Z stare' at work? This is why.

Open analysis →
Reasoning fingerprint for Did you just get the 'Gen Z stare' at work? This is why.A radial comparison of the selected example and the overall average across prominent reasoning signals.framing effectappeal to author…negativity biasin-group biasappeal to emotionhalo effectfundamental attr…out-group homoge…
BS score100.0%
Percentile97%
Strongest shownappeal to authority · 100.0%
Selected exampleOverall average

Reading the view: the atlas compares group averages, the terrain shows only the ranking-edge examples supplied by the snapshot, and the fingerprint compares one selected example with the eligible-profile average.