Author summary
98% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,877 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hayden Daniel results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Indoctrination , and Politically Right Leaning Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 1,658 hits . Analysis detected 17,842 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,508 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 71% (2,555 of 8,706 authors). This Hayden Daniel is worse (more manipulative) than 70.70% of the peer group. Hayden Daniel
Author details
Total words: 11,508
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 70.7% percentile 3.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles11.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.3% 7.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 12.3% 12.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.5% 8.5% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 12.1% 12.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 14.4% 14.4% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 10.2% 10.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.9% 7.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.9%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.4%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 14.3%, sitewide 8.1% Indoctrination: Author 12.3%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 12.1%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Ad Hominem: Author 10.2%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Straw Man: Author 5.6%, sitewide 0.9% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Slippery Slope: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst