Publication summary
94% 118 analyzed articles/videos 93,767 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Federalist results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.7% saturation with 77,537 hits . Analysis detected 620,238 faulty-reasoning hits from 415,685 analyzed words across 118 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 80% (111 of 548 publications). This The Federalist is worse (more manipulative) than 79.90% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 415,685
Article count: 118
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
80% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 79.9% percentile 2.8% BS Score118 analyzed articles415.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 9.9% 9.9% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Publication 15.4% 15.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 18.6% 18.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 7.8% 7.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 11.6% 11.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 4.6% 4.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.2% 3.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.9% 1.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Publication 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 9.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 11.6%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 18.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 7.8%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Publication 15.4%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Authority: Publication 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 10.8%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 8.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 5.1%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Publication 4.8%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Begging the Question: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Straw Man: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 0.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst