Author summary
72% 2 analyzed articles/videos 3,588 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hans Mahncke results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 1,586 hits . Analysis detected 11,640 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,352 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 31% (6,127 of 8,766 authors). This Hans Mahncke is better (less manipulative) than 69.90% of the peer group. Hans Mahncke
Author details
Total words: 14,352
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.1% percentile 1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles14.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.3% 7.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 11.1% 11.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 11.1%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.9%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.0%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst