Author summary
1%1 analyzed article/video8,203 analyzed words
BS Summary: These San Antonio Report Staff results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Framing Effect, and Status Quo Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 1.1% saturation with 354 hits. Analysis detected 2,049 faulty-reasoning hits from 32,812 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.3% and a BS Rank of 0% (8,566 of 8,570 authors). This San Antonio Report Staff is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
San Antonio Report Staff
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff (selected)1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 32,812
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles32.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.1%0.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.2%0.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.1%0.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.1%1.1%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Author 0.1%0.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.4%Primacy Effect: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.5%Burden of Proof: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.4%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos