Publication summary
5% 33 analyzed articles/videos 29,494 analyzed words
BS Summary: These San Antonio Report results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 2.7% saturation with 3,367 hits . Analysis detected 41,577 faulty-reasoning hits from 126,001 analyzed words across 33 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.7% and a BS Rank of 4% (533 of 552 publications). This San Antonio Report is better (less manipulative) than 96.60% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 126,001
Article count: 33
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.4% percentile 0.7% BS Score33 analyzed articles126K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.0% 1.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst