Author summary
3% 2 analyzed articles/videos 3,039 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Xochilt Garcia results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Framing Effect , and Anecdotal , with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 2.2% saturation with 264 hits . Analysis detected 2,302 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,156 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.7% and a BS Rank of 1% (8,635 of 8,717 authors). This Xochilt Garcia is better (less manipulative) than 99.10% of the peer group. Xochilt Garcia
Author details
Total words: 12,156
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.9% percentile 0.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles12.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst