Publication summary
1% 14 analyzed articles/videos 14,179 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Signal Cleveland results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 1.5% saturation with 846 hits . Analysis detected 9,521 faulty-reasoning hits from 57,872 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.4% and a BS Rank of 1% (547 of 548 publications). This Signal Cleveland is better (less manipulative) than 99.80% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 57,872
Article count: 14
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.2% percentile 0.4% BS Score14 analyzed articles57.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 0.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst