Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Celia Hack results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Optimism Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 0.8% saturation with 22 hits. Analysis detected 22 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,638 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 8,536 authors). This Celia Hack is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Celia Hack
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Celia Hack (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 2,638
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–10%
0.0%2%4%6%8%10%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%2%2%4%4%6%6%8%8%10%10%Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Optimism BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos