Author summary
5%2 analyzed articles/videos1,086 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Signal Cleveland Staff results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Overconfidence Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 4.4% saturation with 192 hits. Analysis detected 952 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,344 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of 7% (8,223 of 8,789 authors). This Signal Cleveland Staff is better (less manipulative) than 93.60% of the peer group.
Signal Cleveland Staff
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
7%Signal Cleveland Staff (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,344
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

6% percentile
02550751006.4% percentile
1.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 0.7%0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.2%0.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.1%1.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.5%Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate