Publication summary
88% 575 analyzed articles/videos 466,517 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daily Pilot results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 153,713 hits . Analysis detected 1,749,050 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,081,148 analyzed words across 574 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 52% (279 of 580 publications). This Daily Pilot is worse (more manipulative) than 52.00% of the peer group. Daily Pilot
Publication details
Total words: 2,081,148
Article count: 574
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.0% percentile 1.6% BS Score574 analyzed articles2.1M analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 6.8% 6.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 4.5% 4.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.3% 3.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 2.8% 2.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 4.1% 4.1% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Publication 3.5% 3.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 7.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 4.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 5.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst