Author summary
70% 11 analyzed articles/videos 6,674 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Zahniser results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Self-Serving Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 4,496 hits . Analysis detected 37,262 faulty-reasoning hits from 51,970 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 21% (7,544 of 9,471 authors). This David Zahniser is better (less manipulative) than 79.70% of the peer group. David Zahniser
Author details
Total words: 51,970
Article count: 11
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.3% percentile 1.4% BS Score11 analyzed articles52K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.4% 4.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.7% 8.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst