Author summary
28%3 analyzed articles/videos7,764 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amir-Hussein Radjy results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Overconfidence Bias, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.5% saturation with 1,415 hits. Analysis detected 10,561 faulty-reasoning hits from 25,668 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 7% (8,072 of 8,678 authors). This Amir-Hussein Radjy is better (less manipulative) than 93.00% of the peer group.
Amir-Hussein Radjy
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
7%Amir-Hussein Radjy (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 25,668
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

7% percentile
02550751007.0% percentile
1.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles25.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.5%5.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.9%2.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.1%0.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate