Author summary
3% 1 analyzed article/video 5,388 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Drew Callister results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Confirmation Bias , and Framing Effect , with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 4.3% saturation with 693 hits . Analysis detected 2,232 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,164 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.6% and a BS Rank of 1% (8,900 of 8,970 authors). This Drew Callister is better (less manipulative) than 99.20% of the peer group. Drew Callister
Author details
Total words: 16,164
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.8% percentile 0.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles16.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.1% 0.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.1% 0.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.1% Red Herring: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.7% Indoctrination: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.0% Personal Incredulity: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst