Publication summary
96% 470 analyzed articles/videos 224,443 analyzed words
BS Summary: These One America News Network results contain 55 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 131,757 hits . Analysis detected 1,086,326 faulty-reasoning hits from 869,634 analyzed words across 469 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 71% (160 of 548 publications). This One America News Network is worse (more manipulative) than 70.90% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 869,634
Article count: 469
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 70.9% percentile 2.3% BS Score469 analyzed articles869.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 15.2% 15.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 11.7% 11.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 9.9% 9.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 6.2% 6.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 3.8% 3.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 4.6% 4.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 5.4% 5.4% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Publication 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 15.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 11.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 9.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 6.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 3.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 5.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 5.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Publication 3.8%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst