Publication summary
89% 213 analyzed articles/videos 156,574 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daily Mail results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 79,498 hits . Analysis detected 621,664 faulty-reasoning hits from 662,043 analyzed words across 213 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 57% (246 of 565 publications). This Daily Mail is worse (more manipulative) than 56.60% of the peer group. Daily Mail
Publication details
Total words: 662,043
Article count: 213
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.6% percentile 1.7% BS Score213 analyzed articles662K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 12.0% 12.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 3.5% 3.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 4.0% 4.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 2.3% 2.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 8.9% 8.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 8.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 12.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 7.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 8.9%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 4.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst