Author summary
64% 2 analyzed articles/videos 792 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kelly Garino results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Anecdotal , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 789 hits . Analysis detected 5,008 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,132 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 62% (3,515 of 9,118 authors). This Kelly Garino is worse (more manipulative) than 61.50% of the peer group. Kelly Garino
Author details
Total words: 6,132
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.5% percentile 2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.3% 8.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.6% 9.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.5% 5.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 12.9% 12.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Author 7.0%, sitewide 5.2% Halo Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Red Herring: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst