Author summary
53% 8 analyzed articles/videos 4,907 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sharon Mai results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 1,399 hits . Analysis detected 12,005 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,628 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 23% (7,336 of 9,471 authors). This Sharon Mai is better (less manipulative) than 77.50% of the peer group. Sharon Mai
Author details
Total words: 19,628
Article count: 8
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.5% percentile 1.5% BS Score8 analyzed articles19.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.6% 0.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.1%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst