Publication summary
79% 88 analyzed articles/videos 40,853 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Bulwark results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 30,781 hits . Analysis detected 222,924 faulty-reasoning hits from 242,157 analyzed words across 88 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 55% (254 of 559 publications). This The Bulwark is worse (more manipulative) than 54.70% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 242,157
Article count: 88
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 54.7% percentile 1.7% BS Score88 analyzed articles242.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 4.8% 4.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 9.9% 9.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 2.5% 2.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 12.7% 12.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 2.1% 2.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Publication 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 5.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 9.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 12.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 4.3%, sitewide 2.0% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst