Author summary
80%1 analyzed article/video1,683 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matt Gurney results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 840 hits. Analysis detected 3,506 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,049 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 81% (1,800 of 9,212 authors). This Matt Gurney is worse (more manipulative) than 80.50% of the peer group.
Matt Gurney
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
81%Matt Gurney (selected)4%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,049
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

81% percentile
025507510080.5% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.6%6.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 16.6%16.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 12.7%12.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.4%2.4%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 4.3%4.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 1.8%1.8%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Author 1.5%1.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 16.6%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Author 12.7%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.0%Ad Hominem: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.4%Straw Man: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to Nature: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.2%No True Scotsman: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos