Author summary
15%5 analyzed articles/videos571 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jonathan Cohn results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 4.3% saturation with 553 hits. Analysis detected 4,864 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,870 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 7% (8,004 of 8,572 authors). This Jonathan Cohn is better (less manipulative) than 93.40% of the peer group.
Jonathan Cohn
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
7%Jonathan Cohn (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 12,870
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

7% percentile
02550751006.6% percentile
1.1% BS Score5 analyzed articles12.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.3%4.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.0%4.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.3%0.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.0%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos