Author summary
62% 3 analyzed articles/videos 4,325 analyzed words
BS Summary: These William Kristol results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.7% saturation with 4,798 hits . Analysis detected 22,245 faulty-reasoning hits from 27,124 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 32% (6,527 of 9,482 authors). This William Kristol is better (less manipulative) than 68.80% of the peer group. William Kristol
Author details
Total words: 27,124
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.2% percentile 1.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles27.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 17.7% 17.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.4% 10.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.1% 0.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.4%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 17.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst