Author summary
90% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,041 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alyssa Guzman results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 1,433 hits . Analysis detected 11,513 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,344 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 64% (3,431 of 9,471 authors). This Alyssa Guzman is worse (more manipulative) than 63.80% of the peer group. Alyssa Guzman
Author details
Total words: 10,344
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
64% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.8% percentile 2.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles10.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.6% 11.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.9% 5.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.8% 13.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.3% 2.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 7.0% 7.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.3%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.0%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.0%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst