Publication summary
81% 95 analyzed articles/videos 26,199 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The FP results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 17,827 hits . Analysis detected 138,998 faulty-reasoning hits from 131,368 analyzed words across 95 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 66% (202 of 584 publications). This The FP is worse (more manipulative) than 65.50% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 131,368
Article count: 95
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 65.5% percentile 2.0% BS Score95 analyzed articles131.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 5.0% 5.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 9.3% 9.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 13.6% 13.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 3.0% 3.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 4.1% 4.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 1.4% 1.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Publication 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 8.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 9.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 13.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 7.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 4.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst