Author summary
49%1 analyzed article/video219 analyzed words
BS Summary: These River Page results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 84 hits. Analysis detected 685 faulty-reasoning hits from 876 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 78% (2,112 of 9,471 authors). This River Page is worse (more manipulative) than 77.70% of the peer group.
River Page
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
78%River Page (selected)4%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 876
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

78% percentile
025507510077.7% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles876 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.9%4.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.2%8.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.2%6.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.3%2.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 4.8%4.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 4.7%4.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 4.1%4.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 5.0%5.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 8.0%8.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 9.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.0%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.7%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.9%Loss Aversion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos