Author summary
98% 5 analyzed articles/videos 1,508 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Evan Hurst results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Ad Hominem , and Politically Left Leaning Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 42.9% saturation with 6,515 hits . Analysis detected 31,003 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,194 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 85% (1,305 of 8,642 authors). This Evan Hurst is worse (more manipulative) than 84.90% of the peer group. Evan Hurst
Author details
Total words: 15,194
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
85% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 84.9% percentile 4.5% BS Score5 analyzed articles15.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 42.9% 42.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 24.7% 24.7% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 19.7% 19.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 24.8% 24.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 13.5% 13.5% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Author 5.1% 5.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 42.9%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 24.8%, sitewide 19.2% Ad Hominem: Author 24.7%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 19.7%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.5%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 13.5%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 3.1% Anecdotal: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Straw Man: Author 5.1%, sitewide 0.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Horn Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst