Author summary
77% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,463 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anita Chabria results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.9% saturation with 1,165 hits . Analysis detected 7,551 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,852 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 76% (2,118 of 8,541 authors). This Anita Chabria is worse (more manipulative) than 75.20% of the peer group. Anita Chabria
Author details
Total words: 5,852
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
75% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 75.2% percentile 3.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.2% 8.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 19.9% 19.9% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 15.4% 15.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.8% 6.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.4% 13.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 7.5% 7.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.2%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 19.9%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 13.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 15.4%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.1%, sitewide 8.1% Ad Hominem: Author 7.5%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.3%, sitewide 5.2% Slippery Slope: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Begging the Question: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Red Herring: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst