Author summary
100% 1 analyzed article/video 767 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tara Dublin results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 66.6% saturation with 2,044 hits . Analysis detected 8,439 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,068 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.4% and a BS Rank of 94% (610 of 9,218 authors). This Tara Dublin is worse (more manipulative) than 93.40% of the peer group. Tara Dublin
Author details
Total words: 3,068
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
93% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 93.4% percentile 7.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 66.6% 66.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 26.3% 26.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 28.9% 28.9% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 18.9% 18.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 10.8% 10.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.8% 8.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 6.8% 6.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 8.4% 8.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Biased Writer Voice: Author 66.6%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 28.9%, sitewide 8.1% Framing Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 26.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 26.3%, sitewide 2.0% Negativity Bias: Author 20.3%, sitewide 19.2% Ad Hominem: Author 18.9%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Indoctrination: Author 10.8%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.9%, sitewide 9.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 3.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 6.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 6.8%, sitewide 1.1% Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.1%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.4% Horn Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.0% Burden of Proof: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst