Keyword summary
81% 2 analyzed articles/videos 868 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rand-Paul results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Unattributed Quote , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.2% saturation with 598 hits . Analysis detected 2,985 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,472 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 71% (17,571 of 59,653 keywords). This Rand-Paul is worse (more manipulative) than 70.50% of the peer group. Rand-Paul
Keyword details
Total words: 3,472
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 70.5% percentile 3.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 14.8% 14.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 14.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 1.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.8% Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.4% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst