Publication summary
53%3 analyzed articles/videos438 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Racket News results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, In-Group Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 532 hits. Analysis detected 2,343 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,964 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 58% (251 of 584 publications). This Racket News is worse (more manipulative) than 57.10% of the peer group.
Racket News
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
0%WSB-TV Channel 2 - Atlanta1%
1%Signal Cleveland1%
1%Montana Free Press1%
1%Just Security1%
1%Greenville News1%
58%Racket News (selected)2%
100%Utah Hockey Club10%
100%Lookout12%
100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
100%MS NOW Live Events26%
100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
Publication details
Total words: 4,964
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

57% percentile
025507510057.1% percentile
1.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 2.7%2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Publication 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Publication 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Publication 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Publication 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Publication 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Publication 3.1%3.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Publication 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Publication 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Publication 10.7%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 6.3%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 0.5%Begging the Question: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 0.5%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate

Analyzed articles and videos