Author summary
86% 23 analyzed articles/videos 8,588 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ebony Davis results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Self-Serving Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 4,902 hits . Analysis detected 42,125 faulty-reasoning hits from 43,783 analyzed words across 23 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 40% (5,744 of 9,471 authors). This Ebony Davis is better (less manipulative) than 60.60% of the peer group. Ebony Davis
Author details
Total words: 43,783
Article count: 23
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.4% percentile 1.9% BS Score23 analyzed articles43.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.8% 10.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.2% 11.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.2% 9.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.9% 1.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.0% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst