Publication summary
84%125 analyzed articles/videos117,549 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Salon results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 73,169 hits. Analysis detected 569,444 faulty-reasoning hits from 546,313 analyzed words across 125 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 61% (216 of 548 publications). This Salon is worse (more manipulative) than 60.70% of the peer group.
Salon
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
0%WSB-TV Channel 2 - Atlanta1%
1%Signal Cleveland1%
1%Montana Free Press1%
1%The Trace1%
1%BridgeDetroit1%
61%Salon (selected)2%
100%The White House9%
100%Utah Hockey Club10%
100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
100%MS NOW Live Events26%
100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
Publication details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

61% percentile
025507510060.7% percentile
1.9% BS Score125 analyzed articles546.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 6.5%6.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 5.3%5.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Publication 10.2%10.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Publication 2.8%2.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Publication 13.4%13.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Publication 3.1%3.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Publication 1.7%1.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Publication 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Publication 2.0%2.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Publication 6.1%6.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 6.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Publication 10.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 13.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Publication 9.4%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Publication 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 6.1%, sitewide 2.0%Optimism Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate