Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Stephen Moore results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem , Indoctrination , and Confirmation Bias , with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 214 hits . Analysis detected 1,557 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,854 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 9,471 authors). This Stephen Moore is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Stephen Moore
Author details
Total words: 1,854
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 11.5% 11.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 9.1% 9.1% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 9.2% 9.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.7% 5.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 11.5%, sitewide 1.4% Ad Hominem: Author 9.2%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 9.1%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 9.0%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.4% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.5% Slippery Slope: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.7% Tu Quoque: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.2% Circular Reasoning: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst