Publication summary
83% 138 analyzed articles/videos 84,265 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Washington Examiner results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 41,800 hits . Analysis detected 411,731 faulty-reasoning hits from 390,839 analyzed words across 138 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 62% (209 of 548 publications). This Washington Examiner is worse (more manipulative) than 62.00% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 390,839
Article count: 138
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 62.0% percentile 2.0% BS Score138 analyzed articles390.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 8.1% 8.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 3.7% 3.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.0% 3.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 10.7% 10.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 2.1% 2.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 1.7% 1.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Publication 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 8.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 8.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 5.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 10.7%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 8.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 4.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst