Author summary
65% 8 analyzed articles/videos 2,101 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Carter Schroppe results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Quote-first Misdirection , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 1,091 hits . Analysis detected 6,858 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,992 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 41% (5,169 of 8,637 authors). This Carter Schroppe is better (less manipulative) than 59.80% of the peer group. Carter Schroppe
Author details
Total words: 9,992
Article count: 8
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.2% percentile 2.0% BS Score8 analyzed articles10K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.9% 10.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.0% 10.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst