Author summary
65%8 analyzed articles/videos2,101 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Carter Schroppe results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 1,091 hits. Analysis detected 6,858 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,992 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 41% (5,169 of 8,637 authors). This Carter Schroppe is better (less manipulative) than 59.80% of the peer group.
Carter Schroppe
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
41%Carter Schroppe (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 9,992
Article count: 8
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

40% percentile
025507510040.2% percentile
2.0% BS Score8 analyzed articles10K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 10.9%10.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.0%10.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.9%3.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.1%3.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 10.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 10.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate