Author summary
2% 2 analyzed articles/videos 401 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sydney Topf results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Framing Effect , and Quote-first Misdirection , with Status Quo Bias as the most egregious example at 3.1% saturation with 49 hits . Analysis detected 251 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,604 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 32% (5,944 of 8,700 authors). This Sydney Topf is better (less manipulative) than 68.30% of the peer group. Sydney Topf
Author details
Total words: 1,604
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.7% percentile 1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.2% 1.2% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 1.9% 1.9% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Author 3.0% 3.0% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst