Fox News94%

Fauci held in contempt as COVID cellphone lands in hands of Senate investigators 21%

8/6/2026, 6:13:09 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 10 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Framing Effect, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 91 hits. Analysis detected 372 faulty-reasoning hits from 600 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 28% and a BS Rank of 21% (23,907 of 30,190 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 79.20% of the article peer group.

Senate Republicans moved to hold Dr. 
Anthony Fauci in contempt of Congress in their pursuit of forcing the former architect of the nation’s COVID-19 response to go on record about his actions leading up to and during the pandemic. 
The Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee voted on sharp party lines to charge Fauci, the former chief medical advisor to the president, with contempt after he refused to answer questions from both sides of the aisle over fear of self-incrimination. 
The move follows Fauci’s decision to invoke his Fifth Amendment rights more than 100 times during his hearing last week, which prompted the panel’s chair, Sen. 
Rand Paul, R-Ky., to vow that he would face "repercussions" for not testifying, or at least how Paul envisioned. 
FAUCI'S HHS IPHONE TURNED OVER TO SENATE INVESTIGATORS AS CONTEMPT VOTE LOOMS 
Typically, once a contempt resolution passes by committee, it heads to the Senate floor for a full vote. 
However, Paul’s resolution allows that step to be skipped altogether and allows him to send the referral directly to the U.S. 
Attorney for the District of Columbia. 
But Paul wants the Department of Justice (DOJ) involved as soon as possible. 
There’s also the question whether Fauci’s pardon from former President Joe Biden protected him during the hearing, which Paul hopes to find answers to. 
"It’s a good legal discussion, and we will make those legal points to DOJ in sending the referral over," Paul told Fox News Digital ahead of the hearing. 
RAND PAUL PREDICTS FAUCI CONTEMPT VOTE WILL PASS, VOWS SWIFT DOJ REFERRAL 
It’s another chapter in the feud between Paul and Fauci that has extended over the last several years since the onset of the pandemic. 
Paul has accused the former National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) director of funding "risky" research that led to an alleged lab leak of the COVID-19 virus in China and has demanded that he end up behind bars. 
And in the background, a copy of Fauci’s pandemic-era cellphone is now in the possession of Senate Republican investigators. 
Fox News Digital confirmed that the Robert F. 
Kennedy Jr.-led Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) sent over a copy of the phone to the Senate Homeland Security Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations chaired by Sen. 
Ron Johnson, R-Wis. 
TOP 5 MOMENTS FROM FAUCI'S HEARING: PAUL BOOTS LAWYER, MORENO ERUPTS AS CONTEMPT VOTE LOOMS 
That committee falls under the umbrella of Paul’s Homeland Security panel, which also received a trove of over 1,000 pages of Fauci’s personal diary before last week’s hearing. 
It is unclear if Johnson and Paul have access to the information on the phone. 
Meanwhile, across the marble expanse of the Capitol, Republican investigators in the House are cooking up their own probe into Fauci. 
House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., previously signaled that he was not done with Fauci, either. 
After the longtime public health official pleaded the Fifth Amendment during his Senate hearing, Comer questioned the validity of his preemptive pardon granted by President Joe Biden. 
He also said his committee would be questioning Fauci further, though he did not elaborate. 
"If former President Biden’s blanket autopen pardon is valid, then Dr. 
Fauci has no right to refuse to answer questions," Comer said, noting his committee had done extensive work probing the autopen pardons. 
"Based on the release of Dr. 
Fauci’s diary, which should have been provided to the House Oversight Committee last Congress...we’ll be asking Dr. 
Fauci whether he stands by his previous testimony to our Committee." 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 15.2%Fox Nation: 4.0%Confirmation Bias15.2%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.1%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 3.5%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 6.8%Fox Nation: 11.3%Framing Effect6.8%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.6%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.6%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 8.8%Fox Nation: 10.4%Negativity Bias8.8%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 3.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias4.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 3.2%Fox Nation: 2.4%Ad Hominem3.2%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 4.8%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 1.8%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma1.8%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.7%Fox Nation: 5.9%Hasty Generalization6.7%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 7.5%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.2%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.3%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.5%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.7%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 3.2%Fox Nation: 1.3%Quote-first Misdirection3.2%This article: 3.5%Fox Nation: 6.1%Biased Writer Voice3.5%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 8.8%Fox Nation: 3.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias8.8%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

600 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers15%attributed speech511writer words
Selected voice

James Comer

18%flagged-word coverage
61 attributed words69% of attributed speech42% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Politically Right Leaning -10.4 ptsWriter: 10.4%James Comer: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-4.1 ptsWriter: 4.1%James Comer: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-3.7 ptsWriter: 3.7%James Comer: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.