Author summary
70%22 analyzed articles/videos12,396 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chris Walker results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 5,068 hits. Analysis detected 46,507 faulty-reasoning hits from 54,340 analyzed words across 22 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 31% (6,624 of 9,471 authors). This Chris Walker is better (less manipulative) than 69.90% of the peer group.
Chris Walker
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
31%Chris Walker (selected)2%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 54,340
Article count: 22
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

30% percentile
025507510030.1% percentile
1.6% BS Score22 analyzed articles54.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.3%6.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.3%9.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.2%6.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.8%1.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.2%1.2%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.6%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 2.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate