Author summary
41% 15 analyzed articles/videos 9,625 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mary Clare Jalonick results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 3,875 hits . Analysis detected 24,745 faulty-reasoning hits from 51,970 analyzed words across 15 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 8% (8,107 of 8,744 authors). This Mary Clare Jalonick is better (less manipulative) than 92.70% of the peer group. Mary Clare Jalonick
Author details
Total words: 51,970
Article count: 15
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.3% percentile 1.1% BS Score15 analyzed articles52K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.2% 1.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 7.5%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst