Publication summary
95% 119 analyzed articles/videos 73,388 analyzed words
BS Summary: These RedState results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.8% saturation with 64,072 hits . Analysis detected 472,164 faulty-reasoning hits from 324,257 analyzed words across 119 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 79% (116 of 548 publications). This RedState is worse (more manipulative) than 79.00% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 324,257
Article count: 119
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
79% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 79.0% percentile 2.7% BS Score119 analyzed articles324.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 8.5% 8.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 19.8% 19.8% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Publication 14.7% 14.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 7.8% 7.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 13.0% 13.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.3% 3.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 1.6% 1.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Publication 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 8.5%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 19.8%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Publication 13.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 7.8%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Publication 14.7%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 9.3%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 6.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Publication 6.2%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Publication 4.3%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst