Author summary
82%1 analyzed article/video674 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kyle Becker results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ad Hominem, and Hasty Generalization, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 202 hits. Analysis detected 1,656 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,022 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 71% (2,570 of 8,706 authors). This Kyle Becker is worse (more manipulative) than 70.50% of the peer group.
Kyle Becker
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
71%Kyle Becker (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,022
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

71% percentile
025507510070.5% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.7%2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.3%0.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.1%9.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.3%0.3%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 10.0%10.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 8.2%8.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.3%2.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.3%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 10.0%, sitewide 1.4%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Author 8.2%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Bandwagon: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Straw Man: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.6%Horn Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos