Topic summary
77% 36 analyzed articles/videos 22,165 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Us Economy results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 8,559 hits . Analysis detected 82,377 faulty-reasoning hits from 111,328 analyzed words across 36 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 15% (19,245 of 22,519 topics). This Us Economy is better (less manipulative) than 85.50% of the peer group. Us Economy
Topic details
Total words: 111,328
Article count: 36
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.5% percentile 1.4% BS Score36 analyzed articles111.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.7% 7.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.5%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.0% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst