Author summary
45% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,263 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Yuri Kageyama results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 313 hits . Analysis detected 2,619 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,052 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 46% (4,980 of 9,133 authors). This Yuri Kageyama is better (less manipulative) than 54.50% of the peer group. Yuri Kageyama
Author details
Total words: 5,052
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
46% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 45.5% percentile 2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.0% 5.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.4% 2.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.8% 0.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Slippery Slope: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.4% Indoctrination: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst