Publication summary
66% 101 analyzed articles/videos 54,508 analyzed words
BS Summary: These CNBC results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 15,280 hits . Analysis detected 160,487 faulty-reasoning hits from 235,668 analyzed words across 101 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 38% (345 of 548 publications). This CNBC is better (less manipulative) than 62.90% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 235,668
Article count: 101
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.1% percentile 1.3% BS Score101 analyzed articles235.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 5.1% 5.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 3.8% 3.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 3.3% 3.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 2.3% 2.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 3.7% 3.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 5.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 5.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 6.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 3.8%, sitewide 0.5% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst