Author summary
57% 5 analyzed articles/videos 2,707 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lee Ying Shan results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Overconfidence Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.3% saturation with 664 hits . Analysis detected 7,219 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,546 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 36% (6,155 of 9,506 authors). This Lee Ying Shan is better (less manipulative) than 64.70% of the peer group. Lee Ying Shan
Author details
Total words: 10,546
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.3% percentile 1.8% BS Score5 analyzed articles10.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.3% 6.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst