Author summary
35% 1 analyzed article/video 562 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jason Gewirtz results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias , Negativity Bias , and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , with Recency Bias as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 216 hits . Analysis detected 758 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,248 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 45% (4,730 of 8,525 authors). This Jason Gewirtz is better (less manipulative) than 55.50% of the peer group. Jason Gewirtz
Author details
Total words: 2,248
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.5% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.4% 0.4% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 9.6% 9.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.7% 1.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.2% 1.2% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.5%, sitewide 11.1% Recency Bias: Author 9.6%, sitewide 2.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.4%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 4.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst