Author summary
84%6 analyzed articles/videos4,960 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Bloom results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Overconfidence Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 20% saturation with 4,082 hits. Analysis detected 17,824 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,392 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 49% (4,367 of 8,543 authors). This Michael Bloom is better (less manipulative) than 51.10% of the peer group.
Michael Bloom
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
49%Michael Bloom (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 20,392
Article count: 6
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

49% percentile
025507510048.9% percentile
2.2% BS Score6 analyzed articles20.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 20.0%20.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 10.6%10.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.5%2.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.3%0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Author 20.0%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Author 10.6%, sitewide 1.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 4.6%Halo Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.7%Anchoring Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 4.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate