Author summary
84% 6 analyzed articles/videos 4,960 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Bloom results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Overconfidence Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 20% saturation with 4,082 hits . Analysis detected 17,824 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,392 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 49% (4,367 of 8,543 authors). This Michael Bloom is better (less manipulative) than 51.10% of the peer group. Michael Bloom
Author details
Total words: 20,392
Article count: 6
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 48.9% percentile 2.2% BS Score6 analyzed articles20.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 20.0% 20.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 10.6% 10.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.3% 0.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 26.9% Optimism Bias: Author 20.0%, sitewide 6.0% Negativity Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 10.6%, sitewide 1.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 4.6% Halo Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 4.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst