Author summary
87% 1 analyzed article/video 574 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Deena Zaidi results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Anchoring Bias , and Self-Serving Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 17.7% saturation with 407 hits . Analysis detected 2,352 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,296 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 80% (1,859 of 9,232 authors). This Deena Zaidi is worse (more manipulative) than 79.90% of the peer group. Deena Zaidi
Author details
Total words: 2,296
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
80% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 79.9% percentile 3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.5% 6.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 17.7% 17.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 9.4% 9.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 8.7% 8.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 7.7% 7.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Author 17.7%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.7%, sitewide 11.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 9.4%, sitewide 4.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 8.7%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.7%, sitewide 3.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 6.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Nature: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst