Author summary
67% 6 analyzed articles/videos 3,651 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mona Charen results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 2,890 hits . Analysis detected 18,558 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,503 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 35% (6,165 of 9,471 authors). This Mona Charen is better (less manipulative) than 65.10% of the peer group. Mona Charen
Author details
Total words: 21,503
Article count: 6
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.9% percentile 1.8% BS Score6 analyzed articles21.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.8% 4.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.8% 3.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 13.4% 13.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 7.7% 7.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.0% 6.0% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 5.2% 5.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 13.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Ad Hominem: Author 7.7%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.2%, sitewide 0.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst